Arbitration Panel awards Power Plant Owner over US$300 million in International Construction Dispute
Brief
In 2008, an Energy Plant Owner entered into a lump-sum, turnkey engineering, procurement and construction contract with an energy contractor for the design and construction of a 300-megawatt solid fuel-fired power plant near Porto Quetzal, Guatemala. The power plant was scheduled to start construction efforts in spring 2010 and begin operations in mid-2013. The plant consists of two units and can be operated with coal fuel and/or petroleum coke, with the capability to run on 100% coal and up to 60% petroleum coke.
Throughout the project, the energy contractor failed to timely perform its engineering, procurement, and construction work, leading to lengthy unexcused schedule delays. In 2013, after the energy contractor failed to achieve the scheduled take-over dates, the Owner terminated the energy contractor for default. The Owner retained several subcontractors to complete the work post-termination. Both units were ready for commercial operations in mid-2015.
What we did
HKA was retained by outside counsel on behalf of the Energy Plant Owner to assist in resolving the dispute. Our experts analysed the Owner’s claims, as well as analysis and rebuttal of the energy contractor’s delay and disruption claims. The energy contractor’s claims purportedly resulted from late site handover, delayed basic design approval, customs delays, visa delays, and other alleged owner-responsible impacts.
HKA also analysed and confirmed the reasonableness of the Owners’s post-termination estimate to complete and schedule to complete. In July 2015, we testified at arbitration hearings in Dublin, Ireland before a three-member International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) tribunal.
Outcomes
In 2016, the ICC arbitration panel ruled in the Energy Plant Owner’s favor, awarding over $300 million to the Owner and effectively zeroing out the energy contractor’s $875 million in counterclaims. As part of the reward, the Owner recovered all of the liquidated damages amounts to which it was contractually entitled and recovered approximately 95% of its claimed re-procurement costs.
HKA’s analysis helped to show that the energy contractor’s delay and disruption claims were almost entirely unfounded.

"HKA’s analysis helped to show that the energy contractor's delay and disruption claims were almost entirely unfounded."
-
ClientJaguar Energy
-
Year2008-2016
-
ValueUS$300 million
-
ServicesDisruption, Delay
-
SectorsPower & Utilities
RELATED PROJECTS
RELATED PROJECTS

Spent Nuclear Fuel Verdicts & Settlements
Americas

Subsea Cable Installation & Trenching Operations
Asia

Missouri Power Plant
Americas

Subsea Power Cable Failure
Asia

Major Nuclear Plant
Americas

Subsea Interconnector Cable Failure
Europe

Bakersfield Power Plant
Americas

Clean Fuels Project
Middle East

Longview Power Plant
Americas

Nuclear Power Plant Decommissioning
Americas

Major Canadian Utility Commercial Damages Matter
Americas

Coal-fired power plant
Asia

Sydney Water, Partnering for Success (P4S)
Oceania

Coal-fired power plant
Americas

Natural Gas-Fired Power Plant
Asia

Water desalination plant
Americas

Lower South Creek Treatment Program
Oceania

Electricity Network Improvement
Oceania

Strategic Procurement & Programme Management Improvement
Oceania

Business Reform & Procurement Strategy
Australia

Yanbu Power & Desalination Plant
Yanbu Industrial City, Saudi Arabia
Follow HKA on WeChat
关注我们的官方微信公众号
