Article
Navigating Energy and Infrastructure Projects Amid Heightened Regional Tensions
13th March 2026
Something we all hoped never to experience has become part of daily reality: our country facing missile and drone attacks as regional conflict continues to unfold. While we hope the situation stabilises and that peace is restored soon, we continue to navigate the realities of living and working under heightened uncertainty. For those delivering energy and infrastructure projects, this means balancing personal safety and wellbeing with the practical need to maintain operations, support teams, and protect commercial and contractual positions.
Conflicts and attacks on critical energy infrastructure are now directly affecting oil and gas projects across the Middle East. Recent projectile incidents on major refineries and processing facilities have led to shutdowns and force‑majeure declarations, highlighting the vulnerability of upstream and downstream assets to regional escalation. Disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, driven by actual or potential vessel damage, insurer withdrawal, and large‑scale anchoring of tankers, have delayed the movement of equipment, bulk materials, and specialist modules essential to major EPC programmes. Airspace restrictions, airlines’ operational limitations – whether compulsory or discretionary, and heightened security measures have further constrained the mobility of resources with knock‑on effects for commissioning and other site‑based activities.
While these developments may appear to fall neatly within force majeure or exceptional event provisions, experience from large‑scale EPC disputes across the region shows that entitlement to time and cost is seldom automatic or straightforward. Parties must still demonstrate clear causal entitlement, procedural compliance, and a robust evidential record to secure relief.
Below is a practical framework for parties to address the contractual and evidential implications of conflict‑related impacts with the aim of protecting entitlement and minimising exposure to losses.
Immediate Priority Actions Following a Conflict Event
When a conflict‑related incident occurs, such as a projectile strike affecting energy infrastructure, an airspace closure, or a sudden disruption to shipping routes, project teams must act swiftly and decisively across three parallel workstreams. The aim is to protect people and assets, preserve contractual rights, capture the evidence required for any future claim and mitigate further risk.
Safety and Operational Protection
The immediate and overriding priority is the safety of personnel and the protection of critical assets. Typical actions include:
- Temporary suspension of site operations where safety cannot be assured.
- Evacuation or controlled reduction of workforce.
- Securing hazardous materials, plant, and live systems.
- Activating emergency response protocols.
- Coordinating with local authorities, security advisers, and asset‑owner control rooms.
All steps should be contemporaneously documented, as this record may later support claims relating to suspension, disruption, idle resources, or delay.
Contractual Positioning
Once immediate safety measures are in place; project teams must quickly establish their contractual position. Conflict‑related events may trigger force majeure / exceptional event provisions. However, they may also present relief mechanisms through change‑in‑law clauses, suspension rights, access, logistics, price escalation, government action, and/or at law. Key questions include:
- Does the event qualify as force majeure/exceptional event under the contract?
- Does the contract allow cost/loss recovery, or only extension of time/relief from other potential liabilities/consequences?
- Which specific clauses may provide entitlement to recover any lost time or additional cost/loss?
- What notice requirements apply?
- What time limits exist for notification?
- Are any government/other relevant authority directives or security restrictions relevant to entitlement?
Prudent practice is to issue protective notices reserving rights while the full impact is still being assessed.
Establishing the Evidential Baseline
It is critical to establish a clear baseline record of the project status at the time the event occurred. Key information should include:
- Progress and status of activities/works at the time of event.
- Labour, plant, equipment, temporary works, and subcontractors’ deployment records on site.
- Materials, plant, and equipment delivered, stored, or installed.
- Critical deliveries in transit, delayed, or cancelled.
- Photographs, logs, security reports and any operational restrictions imposed.
- Procurement schedule.
- Cost records of resources prior the event date.
These records form the foundation for later delay and quantum analyses of the impacts of the events.
Contractual Classification of the Event
Once the immediate situation is stabilised, it is prudent to determine how the conflict‑related incident is classified under the contract. This classification shapes all subsequent entitlement to time, money, suspension rights, and mitigation obligations.
Under many standard forms, events such as war, hostilities, terrorism, blockades, or government‑imposed restrictions may fall within the definition of an exceptional event, provided the conditions of being beyond the contractor’s control, unforeseeable, and unavoidable are satisfied.
Where an event is classified as an Exceptional Event, contractors are often entitled to:
- Extension of Time for the period in which performance is prevented.
- Suspension of the Works where necessary for safety or compliance with government or security directives.
However, most contracts do not automatically provide entitlement to additional cost/loss for conflict‑related impact unless expressly stated. This distinction between relief against time obligations and other potential liabilities/consequences and cost/loss recovery is commercially critical, particularly in the oil and gas sector where prolonged logistics disruption, supply chain rerouting, and resource idling can generate significant unrecoverable expenditure.
A clear and early understanding of the contractual categorisation enables the project team to:
- Adopt the correct notice strategy.
- Avoid prejudicing entitlement.
- Develop a mitigation approach.
- Manage stakeholder expectations regarding time and cost exposure.
Typical contractual provisions that may provide time and/or cost/loss relief include:
- Force Majeure / Exceptional Events.
- Prevention and access‑related clauses.
- Suspension provisions.
- Change in Law clauses.
- Escalation of rates and prices.
- Termination for prolonged force majeure or prolonged suspension.
Identifying the Types of Claims That May Arise
Conflict‑related events can give rise to several categories of claim, depending on the nature of the event and the contractual risk allocation. A clear understanding of these potential claims enables early strategy setting, timely notices, and effective evidence gathering.
Damage to the Works
Where a projectile strike, or related debris, directly damages works under construction, the following consequences typically arise:
- Reinstatement of the Works: The contractor may be obliged to reinstate damaged works and make safe any areas containing shrapnel / unexploded devices – this may give rise to an instruction and change under the contract.
- Extension of Time: Physical damage caused by conflict‑related events may qualify for an extension of time where it delays progress on critical activities.
- Recovery Through Insurance: Reinstatement costs may be recoverable under the project’s insurance arrangements, if the policy includes appropriate cover for war, terrorism, or malicious acts. Many recent incidents in the region highlight the importance of reviewing these policies proactively, as some industrial facilities in the GCC have suffered drone‑related fires or operational shutdowns.
Given the current regional environment, where insurers have withdrawn or restricted war‑risk cover for assets and maritime transport, project teams must carefully verify the scope of insured perils, exclusions, deductibles, and notification obligations.
A clear and contemporaneous record of damage, including photographs, inspection reports, asset logs, and security reports, is essential for supporting both contractual entitlements and insurance claims.
Delay Claims
Even where no physical damage occurs, conflict‑related disruption can generate significant time impacts. Recent events affecting refineries, fires linked to strikes in industrial zones, and widespread disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, have shown how quickly project logistics and labour movement can be affected.
Typical sources of delay include:
- Supply chain interruption due to material shortages, diverted or stranded shipments, insurer withdrawal, or suspended marine routes.
- Loss or reduced availability of workforce, whether from safety restrictions, evacuation measures, or travel constraints.
- Restricted site access resulting from security measures, road closures, or airspace restrictions.
- Energy shortages or utility instability, especially where nearby energy installations have been targeted or temporarily shut down.
To succeed with a delay claim, it is essential to demonstrate that the event relied upon impacted activities in the accepted programme. This requires a clear evidential record of:
- the programme status at the moment the disruption occurred.
- the affected work fronts, resources, and planned progress.
- the causal pathway between the incident and resulting delay.
- any mitigation efforts reasonably undertaken.
Robust contemporaneous records and a disciplined approach to delay analysis are critical, particularly in the oil and gas sector where logistics and labour disruptions can rapidly cascade into programme‑wide delay.
Additional Costs/Losses
Where conflict‑related events extend activity or project duration, contractors are likely to incur additional costs/losses arising from the extended presence of personnel, plant, and site facilities.
Typical additional cost categories include:
- Site management and supervision (extended project supervision, engineering and HSE oversight).
- Security measures, which often increase during periods of regional tension.
- Plant and equipment standby, including cranes, lifting equipment, contracted heavy plant, or specialist oil & gas machinery idle due to affected work fronts.
- Site accommodation, welfare and utilities, which continue to accrue even when progress is slowed or temporarily halted.
- Extended labour/subcontractor presence, where labour or specialist trades are retained during affected periods.
- Financing, arising from the need to secure additional funding to absorb unplanned costs, often at elevated borrowing rates.
- Escalation, driven by constraints on air, sea, and land logistics, resulting in resource scarcity and cost inflation.
- Head Office Overheads costs/losses.
Recovery of prolongation costs is highly contract‑dependent. Many standard forms provide extension of time for exceptional events but do not automatically grant cost entitlement unless expressly stated (e.g., change in law, suspension, or employer‑risk events).
Parties ought to document:
- Cost incurred during the critical and compensable periods (cost ledgers, salary slips, invoices, purchase orders, etc.).
- Clear linkage between the conflict‑related event, the extended duration and the cost incurred. (deployment records, timesheets, plant logs, security invoices, accommodation registers, etc.).
- Costs were reasonable and unavoidable (tender comparisons, correspondence, risk assessments, etc.).
- Compliance with notice provisions and any cost‑to‑be‑justified requirements.
In the current operating environment, where conflict‑driven delays, logistics disruption, and insurer withdrawal are increasingly common, establishing this causal connection and maintaining clean records is essential to avoid significant losses.
Disruption and Productivity Loss
Conflict‑related conditions can significantly impair labour productivity, even where no direct damage to the works has occurred due to:
- Enhanced security procedures, such as increased entry checks, restricted movement within the site, or mandatory shelter‑in‑place periods.
- Workforce shortages, where personnel are unable to travel due to airspace restrictions, local movement controls, or safety advisories.
- Restricted working hours, imposed by security authorities or required to maintain safe operations under elevated threat conditions.
- Supply interruptions, caused by delays in critical materials or equipment, particularly where shipping routes such as the Strait of Hormuz have been disrupted or insurers have withdrawn cover, resulting in vessel diversions or cancellations.
- Labour inefficiencies, due to working in an environment subject to heightened uncertainty.
Such impacts may form the basis of disruption claims if properly evidenced.
Demobilisation and Remobilisation
Where conflict‑related conditions require a temporary suspension of works, contractors may face substantial costs associated with standing down and later restarting project operations.
Typical demobilisation and remobilisation cost categories include:
- Demobilisation of labour and plant, stand‑down of workforce, off‑hire of equipment, and transportation of personnel and critical plant away from site.
- Interim site security and preservation, maintaining essential security, environmental protection, and asset preservation measures during suspension.
- Remobilisation of workforce and equipment, re‑establishing site operations, redeploying labour and plant, and restarting construction activities once conditions allow.
These costs can be significant on large oil and gas projects, particularly where specialist plant, heavy lift equipment, or international labour are involved. All demobilisation and remobilisation activities should be documented contemporaneously, including instructions, timing, resource allocation, and costs.
Causation
In dispute proceedings, the existence of a conflict event is rarely disputed. The key question is typically whether the event caused delay and/or additional cost/losses to the project.
Parties ought to demonstrate:
- The timing of the event.
- Which activities were affected.
- Whether those activities were adversely impacted/critical to project completion.
- How long the impact lasted.
- The costs and losses suffered.
Evidence Management – Building a Defensible Claim
Contemporaneous records are the most persuasive evidence in construction disputes.
Project teams should ensure systematic collection of:
Site Records
- Daily site diaries.
- Attendance and gate access logs.
- Plant utilisation reports.
- Site activity records.
Programme Evidence
- Baseline programme.
- Updated programmes.
- Progress reports.
- Delay event records.
Procurement Records
- Supplier correspondence.
- Delivery delays.
- Shipping disruptions.
- Material shortages.
Cost Records
- Payroll records.
- Supplier invoices.
- Equipment rental costs.
- Site overhead cost records.
Together, these records form the evidential foundation upon which entitlement can be assessed.
Managing Subcontractor Claims
Subcontractor claims often form a major portion of conflict‑related project exposure.
Parties should ensure:
- Subcontract notices are issued in accordance with subcontract requirements.
- Subcontractor claims are reviewed and validated for accuracy and contractual basis.
- Supporting evidence (records, cost data, delivery disruptions) is obtained and retained.
- Compensability, advancing subcontractor claims consistent with entitlements available under the main contract.
Failure to coordinate and substantiate subcontractor claims can leave parties carrying unrecoverable costs and significant commercial risk.
Insurance Considerations
Insurance becomes critical where conflict‑related incidents cause physical damage or disrupt logistics. Project teams should review:
- Contractor’s All Risk policies, confirm whether damage from hostile acts is covered.
- Marine cargo insurance, assess implications of war‑risk cancellations and vessel diversions.
- Political risk cover, consider protection against government‑imposed restrictions or expropriation.
- War and terrorism exclusions, many construction policies exclude losses arising from war, terrorism or military action, significantly affecting recoverability.
Many construction policies exclude losses arising from war or military conflict, which can significantly affect financial exposure. Early coordination with insurers and brokers is essential, as gaps in cover can leave contractors exposed to substantial liabilities.
Role of Expert Analysis
Where conflict‑related impacts become significant, early engagement of construction consulting experts can materially strengthen a party’s position.
Experts can assist in:
- Analysing programme impacts, including localised or critical‑path effects of supply delays, workforce restrictions, or shutdowns.
- Structuring claims, ensuring clear causal pathways and defensible methodology.
- Quantifying prolongation costs, based on contemporaneous records and accepted cost‑recovery principles.
- Evaluating subcontractor claims, confirming alignment with main-contract entitlement.
- Preparing robust, evidence‑based project documentation suitable for negotiation or dispute resolution.
Early expert input improves the clarity, consistency and credibility of claims, particularly important where conflict‑related events and their impacts are likely to be contested due their unique and complex nature and magnitude.
Conclusion
Conflicts create a distinct and high‑impact category of delay and disruption for construction projects, particularly in the Middle East’s oil and gas sector. Although such events are beyond the control of the contracting parties, their consequences for schedule, logistics, workforce continuity and project costs can be immediate and substantial.
A critical point often overlooked is that force majeure or exceptional event provisions typically grant relief against time or other potential liabilities/consequences but do not automatically provide cost/loss entitlement. Parties must therefore examine the available contractual mechanisms, such as prevention, suspension, change in law, price escalation, and employer‑risk clauses, to determine whether cost recovery is available. Securing entitlement depends on early contractual assessment, compliance with notice requirements, and maintaining comprehensive contemporaneous records. By combining timely contractual action with disciplined programme, cost, and procurement evidence, and engaging specialist expertise where necessary, project teams can reduce exposure to unrecoverable cost/loss and ensure that valid entitlements are preserved, even amid the severe uncertainty created by regional conflict.
About the author
Daniel Jackson is a Chartered Quantity Surveyor and RICS Accredited Expert Witness with over 20 years of experience in the construction and engineering industries.
Daniel has been involved in over 50 disputes in varying capacities within the buildings, oil and gas, power and infrastructure sectors. His recent appointments include a US$12 billion disputed rail project, a US$15 billion coal fired power plant and a large nuclear power plant. He has also provided quantum expert opinion, dispute resolution services and independent expert determinations of contractual and quantum disputes.
Daniel’s expertise includes matters of quantity surveying, valuation of damages ensuing termination, cost-based claims and disruption claims, assessment of variations – including MEP and establishing quantum principles. He has become especially accustomed with the attribution of prolongation costs pertaining to large, complex engineering projects.
This article presents views, thoughts or opinions that are provided for general information purposes only. It does not represent the views of, or constitute advice of any form (legal, professional or otherwise) from, HKA or any of its affiliates. While HKA takes reasonable care to ensure the accuracy of its contents at the time of publication, the article does not deal with all aspects of the referenced subject matter and may not be relied upon as a substitute for professional judgement or independent analysis. Accordingly, neither HKA nor the author accepts liability for any use of, or reliance on, the information presented in the article. This article is protected by copyright © 2026 HKA Global, LLC/© 2026 HKA Global Ltd. All rights reserved.
在地区紧张局势加剧的背景下,应对能源与基础设施项目所面临的挑战
1. 概述
我们曾希望永远不会经历的事情,如今已成为日常现实的一部分:随着地区冲突持续发酵,我们的国家正面临导弹和无人机的袭击。虽然我们希望局势稳定下来,早日恢复和平,但仍要在高度不确定的环境下,继续应对生活与工作的现实。对于从事能源和基础设施项目的人员而言,这意味着需要在保障人身安全与健康福祉的同时,兼顾维持运营、支持团队以及保护商业和合同地位的实际需求。
冲突及对关键能源基础设施的袭击,如今正直接影响着中东各地的石油和天然气项目。近期发生在主要炼油厂和加工设施上的投射袭击事件已导致企业生产中断并发布不可抗力声明,凸显了上下游资产在面对地区局势升级时的脆弱性。受实际或潜在船只受损、保险公司撤保以及油轮大规模停泊的驱动,霍尔木兹海峡航运受阻,导致对大型EPC(设计、采购、施工)项目至关重要的装备、散装物料和专用模块的运输出现延误。领空限制、航空公司的运营限制(无论是强制性的还是自行决定的),以及强化的安保措施,进一步限制了资源流动,并对调试及其他现场活动产生了连锁效应。
尽管这些事态看似完全可以归入不可抗力或异常事件条款的范畴,但该地区大规模EPC争议的经验表明,工期和成本追偿权益很少能自动实现,过程也并非直截了当。当事方仍然必须证明明确的因果链关系、程序合规以及扎实的证据记录,才能获得救济。
以下是为各方提供的实用框架,旨在处理冲突相关影响所带来的合同和证据方面的问题,以期保护合法权益并尽量减少损失风险。
2. 冲突事件发生后的即时优先行动
发生冲突相关事件时,例如投射袭击影响到能源基础设施、领空关闭或航运路线突然受阻,项目团队必须按三个并行的工作流迅速果断采取行动。目标是保护人员和资产,保留合同权利,为任何未来的索赔收集必要的证据,并减少进一步风险。
A. 安全与运营保护
首要且压倒一切的优先事项是人员安全和保护关键资产。
典型行动包括:
- 在无法确保安全的情况下,临时暂停现场作业。
- 人员撤离或受控减员。
- 确保危险材料、设备和运行系统的安全。
- 启动应急响应预案。
- 与地方当局、安保顾问和资产所有者进行协调。
所有步骤都应同步记录在案,因为这份记录日后可能为有关停工、营运受阻、资源闲置或延误的索赔提供支持。
B. 确立合同地位
一旦即时的安全措施到位,项目团队必须迅速确立自身的合同地位。冲突相关事件可能触发不可抗力/异常事件条款。然而,这类事件也可能通过法律变更条款、停工权、进场、物流、价格上涨、政府行为及/或法律规定提供救济机制。
关键问题包括:
- 该事件是否符合合同中不可抗力/异常事件的条件?
- 合同是允许追回成本/损失,还是仅允许延长工期/免除其他潜在责任/后果?
- 哪些具体条款可能赋予权利来追偿任何延误工期或额外成本/损失?
- 适用哪些通知要求?
- 通知存在哪些时效规定?
- 有无任何政府/其他相关主管部门的指令或安保限制与合同权利相关?
审慎的做法是:在全面影响仍在评估期间,发出保护性通知,保留相关权利。
C. 建立证据基线
在事件发生时,建立一份清晰的项目状态基线记录至关重要。
关键信息应包括:
- 事件发生时各项活动/工程的进度和状态。
- 现场劳动力、设备、装备、临时工程及分包商的部署记录。
- 已交付、存储或安装的材料、设备和装备。
- 在运、已延误或已取消的关键交付项。
- 照片、日志、安全报告以及所施加的任何运营限制。
- 采购进度计划。
- 事件发生前的资源成本记录。
这些记录构成了后续对事件影响进行工期延误和费用量化分析的基础。
3. 根据合同对事件进行定性
一旦紧急情况趋于稳定,明智的做法是根据合同确定该冲突相关事件如何定性。这种定性将决定所有关于工期、费用、停工权以及减损义务的后续权利。
在许多标准格式的合同中,只要超出承包商控制范围、不可预见且不可避免的条件得到满足,战争、敌对行动、恐怖主义、封锁或政府施加的限制等事件,都可能属于异常事件的定义范围。
如果某个事件被定性为异常事件,承包商通常有权:
- 延长工期,期限为无法履约的时间段。
- 暂停工程,只要是为了安全或遵守政府/安全指令所必需。
然而,除了有明确规定外,大多数合同并不会自动赋予承包商权利来追回因冲突相关影响造成的额外成本/损失。区分工期义务和其他潜在责任/后果的免除与成本/损失的追偿,在商业层面至关重要,尤其是在石油和天然气行业,长期物流受阻、供应链改道以及资源闲置都可能产生大量无法追回的支出。
尽早清晰地理解合同的分类,可以使项目团队:
- 采用正确的通知策略。
- 避免损害自身权利。
- 制定减损方法。
- 管理利益相关方对工期和成本风险的预期。
可能提供工期和/或成本/损失救济的典型合同条款包括:
- 不可抗力/异常事件。
- 预防及进场相关条款。
- 停工条款。
- 法律变更条款。
- 费率与价格上涨。
- 因长期不可抗力或长期停工而终止合同。
4. 确定可能产生的索赔类型
根据事件的性质和合同风险配置,冲突相关事件可能引发多种类别的索赔。清晰理解这些潜在索赔,有助于尽早制定策略、及时发出通知并有效收集证据。
A. 工程本身的损坏
当抛射袭击或相关碎片直接损坏在建工程时,通常会产生以下后果:
- 修复工程:承包商可能有义务修复受损工程,并对带有弹片/未爆炸装置的区域进行安全处理 — 这可能引发合同项下的指示和变更。
- 延长工期:如果冲突相关事件造成的物理损坏延误了关键活动的进度,则可能符合延长工期的条件。
- 通过保险追偿:如果保单包含了适当的战争、恐怖主义或恶意行为险,则修复费用或许可以通过项目的保险安排获得补偿。该地区最近的许多事件凸显了预先主动审查这些保单的重要性,因为海湾合作委员会成员国的一些工业设施已因无人机袭击而发生火灾或运营停工。
考虑到当前的地区环境——保险公司已经撤回或限制对资产和海上运输的战争险保障 — 项目团队必须仔细核实承保风险范围、除外责任、免赔额和通知义务。
清晰且同期的损坏记录(包括照片、检查报告、资产日志和安保报告)对于支持合同权利和保险索赔都至关重要。
B. 延误索赔
即使没有发生物理损坏,冲突相关的运营受阻也可能产生重大的工期影响。近期影响到炼油厂的事件、与工业区受袭相关联的火灾,以及霍尔木兹海峡航运大范围受阻,都表明项目物流和劳动力流动受到冲击的速度会有多快。
典型的延误原因包括:
- 供应链中断,源于材料短缺、运输改道或滞留、保险公司撤保或海上航线暂停。
- 劳动力流失或无法获得,无论是源于安全限制、人员撤离措施还是旅行限制。
- 现场出入受限,源于安保措施、道路封闭或空域限制。
- 能源短缺或公用设施不稳定,尤其是在附近的能源设施已经成为袭击目标或暂时关闭的情况下。
要成功提出延误索赔,必须证明所依赖的事件对已批准进度计划中的活动产生了影响。这需要清晰的证据记录,包括:
- 运营受阻发生时的进度计划状态。
- 受影响的作业面、资源和计划的进度。
- 事件与由此导致的延误之间的因果链。
- 合理采取的任何减损措施。
扎实的同期记录和严谨的延误分析方法至关重要,尤其是在石油和天然气行业,物流和劳动力受阻可能会迅速蔓延,导致整个进度计划延误。
C. 额外成本/损失
当冲突相关事件延长了活动或项目的工期时,承包商很可能会因人员、设备和现场设施延长驻留而产生额外成本/损失。
典型的额外成本类别包括:
- 现场管理与监督(延长的项目监督、工程及HSE(健康、安全、环境)监管)。
- 安保措施,在地区紧张时期通常会加强。
- 设备和装备待机,包括因作业面受影响而闲置的起重机、起重装备、合同约定的重型设备或专业的油气机械。
- 现场住宿、生活设施和公用设施,即使在进度放缓或暂停期间,仍会持续产生费用。
- 人工/分包商延长驻留,在受影响期间保留劳动力或专业工种。
- 融资成本,源于需要筹集额外资金来吸收计划外成本,通常伴随着较高的借款利率。
- 价格上涨,由空运、海运和陆运物流受限导致资源稀缺和成本上升。
- 公司总部管理费成本/损失。
工期延长成本的追偿高度依赖于合同条款。许多标准格式合同为异常事件提供工期延长,但除有明确规定(例如法律变更、停工或雇主风险事件)外,不会自动赋予成本补偿权利。
当事方应记录:
- 在关键且应予赔偿期间发生的成本(成本分类账、工资单、发票、采购订单等)。
- 冲突相关事件、工期延长与所发生成本之间的清晰关联。(部署记录、工时单、设备日志、安保发票、住宿登记等)。
- 成本是合理且不可避免的(投标比对、往来函件、风险评估等)。
- 遵守通知条款以及任何成本需经证明的要求。
在当前运营环境下,由冲突驱动的延误、物流受阻和保险公司撤保日益普遍,建立这种因果关联并保持清晰的记录对于避免重大损失至关重要。
D. 干扰与生产力损失
即使工程未遭受直接损毁,冲突相关的条件也可能显著削弱劳动生产力,其原因包括:
- 安保程序加强,例如进场检查增多、现场内移动受限,或强制就地避险时段。
- 劳动力短缺,人员因领空限制、当地行动管制或安全建议而无法出行。
- 工作时间受限,由安保部门强制实施,或为在高威胁条件下维持安全运营所必需。
- 供应中断,由关键材料或装备延误造成,特别是在霍尔木兹海峡等航运路线已经受阻、或保险公司已经撤保,导致船舶改道或取消的情况下。
- 劳动力效率低下,由于是在高度不确定的环境中工作。
此类冲击若能妥善举证,可构成干扰索赔的依据。
E. 撤离与重新调集
当与冲突相关的条件要求暂时停工,承包商可能面临与停工及后续重启项目运营相关的重大成本。
典型的撤离与重新调集成本类别包括:
- 撤离劳动力和设备:劳动力停工、装备退租、人员及关键设备运离现场。
- 临时现场安保与保全:在停工期间维持必要的安保、环境保护和资产保全措施。
- 重新调集劳动力和装备:一旦条件允许就重新建立现场运营、重新部署劳动力和设备,重新启动施工活动。
在大型油气项目中,这些成本可能很高,特别是涉及专业设备、重型起重装备或国际劳动力时。所有撤离与重新调集活动均应同步记录在案,包括指令、时间节点、资源配置和成本。
5. 因果关系
在争议处理程序中,冲突事件的存在本身很少成为争议焦点。关键问题通常是:事件是否对项目造成了延误和/或额外成本/损失。
当事方应证明:
- 事件发生的时间。
- 哪些活动受到了影响。
- 这些活动是否受到不利影响/对项目完工是否关键。
- 影响持续了多长时间。
- 承受的成本和损失。
6. 证据管理 — 构建有据可依的索赔
同期记录是施工争议中最有说服力的证据。
项目团队应确保系统收集以下内容:
现场记录
- 每日现场日志
- 出勤与门禁记录
- 设备使用报告
- 现场活动记录
进度计划证据
- 基线进度计划
- 更新后的进度计划
- 进度报告
- 延误事件记录
采购记录
成本记录
- 工资记录
- 供应商发票
- 装备租赁成本
- 现场管理费成本记录
这些记录共同构成了评估合同权利所需的证据基础。
7. 管理分包商的索赔
分包商的索赔通常构成冲突相关项目风险的主要部分。
各方应确保:
- 分包商通知按照分包合同要求发出。
- 分包商索赔经过审核及验证,确保其准确并有合同依据。
- 支持性证据(记录、成本数据、交付受阻证明)得以获取并保留。
- 补偿资格,依据主合同所赋予的权利来推进分包商索赔。
未能对分包商的索赔进行协调和举证,可能使各方承担无法追回的成本和重大的商业风险。
8. 保险考虑因素
当冲突相关事件造成物理损坏或物流受阻时,保险变得至关重要。项目团队应审查:
- 承包商一切险保单:确认敌对行为造成的损坏是否在承保范围内。
- 海运货物保险:评估战争险取消和船舶改道的影响。
- 政治风险保障:考虑针对政府施加的限制或征用提供保护。
- 战争与恐怖主义除外责任:许多建筑保单将战争、恐怖主义或军事行动造成的损失排除在外,这显著影响了追回损失的可能性。
许多建筑保单将战争或军事冲突造成的损失排除在外,这可能严重影响财务风险敞口。尽早与保险公司和经纪人协调至关重要,因为保障缺口可能使承包商面临重大责任。
10. 专家分析的作用
当与冲突相关影响变得严重时,尽早聘请建筑咨询专家可以实质性地增强当事方的地位。
专家可以在以下方面提供协助:
- 分析进度计划影响,包括供应延迟、劳动力限制或停工对局部或关键路径的影响。
- 构建索赔结构,确保因果链清晰,方法得当,有理有据。
- 量化延长工期的成本,基于同期记录和公认的成本追偿原则。
- 评估分包商的索赔,确认与主合同权利一致。
- 准备扎实的、基于证据的项目文件记录,适合用于谈判或解决争议。
尽早引入专家意见可以提高索赔主张的清晰度、一致性和可信度,这在冲突相关事件及其影响因其独特而复杂的性质和规模而可能受到质疑时尤为重要。
结论
冲突产生了建筑项目中一个独特且具有高度影响的延误和干扰类型,尤其是在中东的油气行业。尽管此类事件超出了合同各方的控制范围,但它们对进度计划、物流、劳动力连续性以及项目成本的影响可能是直接且巨大的。
一个经常被忽视的关键点是:不可抗力或异常事件条款通常仅提供工期或免除其他潜在责任/后果方面的救济,而不会自动提供成本/损失的权利。因此,各方必须审视既有的合同机制,例如预防、停工、法律变更、价格上涨以及雇主风险条款,以确定是否可以追偿成本。取得合同权利取决于:尽早评估合同、遵守通知要求,以及保持全面的同期记录。
通过将及时的合同行动与严谨的进度计划、成本和采购证据相结合,并在必要时引入专家专长,项目团队可以减少无法追回成本/损失的风险,并确保正当有效的合同权利得以保留,即使在地区冲突造成严重不确定的背景下也是如此。